THE EFFECTS OF TEXTUAL ENHANCEMENT ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING SIMPLE PAST TENSE ON READING TEXT

Noor Fitriah

Abstract


Grammar is very needed to gain the communicative comptence as the main goal of learning foreign language, so the grammar should be learned and acquired by the students in order to be able to avoid making mistakes when using language whether in speaking, listening, reading and writing.  in line with this, grammar is the structural foundation of our ability to express ourselves. The more people are aware of how it works, the more they can monitor the meaning and the effectiveness of the way they use language. Teaching and learning  grammar of a language is still being questioned is a controversial issue, “teach or not teach Grammar”. This factorial research design was investigated the effects of textual enhancement in learning simple past tense toward students’ initial (high achievers and low achievers). The participants were the eighth graders at SMPN 1 Daha Utara. to determine the effects Two-Way ANOVA was employed to analyze the data. The results demonstrate although the textual enhancement had significant effect and the students in different initial had different achievement. and also found an interaction between the TE and students’ initial.

Keywords


Textual Enhancement; Students’ Learning; Simple Past Tense; Reading Text.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alsadhan, R. O. 2011. .Effect of Textual Enhancement and Explicit Rule Presentation on The Noticing and Acquisition of L2 Grammatical Structures: A Meta-Analysis. Colorado: Colorado State University Fort Collins

Ayiewbey.S. 2013. The Effects of Textual Enhancement on Learning English Past Tense. World applied Sciences Journal 27 (8): 1042-1048, 2013

Brantmeier.C, Callender.A, Yu. X, & McDaniel,M . 2012. Textual Enhancements and Comprehension with Adult Readers of English in China. Reading in a Foreign Language Journal, Vol. 24, no. 2 ISSN 1539-0578

Brown, H.D. 2004. Teaching by Principle; an Interactive Approach to language Pedaogy. USA: Pearson, Longman.

Chen, M .2011. Effects of Textual Enhancement on ESL Students’ Learning of English Passive Voice. Department of English, Northern Arizona University

Collin, P. 2006. Grammar in TEF; A Critique of Indonesian High School Textbooks. TEFLIN Vol. 17 No.1 1-10

Dalili, K, Kassaian & Eslami. 2011. The Effect of Textual Enhancemet on System Learning of English Dative Alternation. World Applied Sciences Journal 15 (Innovation and Pedagogy foe Lifelong Learning):63-69. IDOSI Publications

Ellis, R. 1994. The study of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press

Fotos, S &Hinkel, E. 2002. New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. United States of America: Lawrence Eribaum Associates,Inc.

Furaidah & Mukminatien, N. 2008. The Place of Grammar in language Teaching; an Attempt Towards a Synthesis of its Teaching Approaches. Bahasa dan Seni, Vol. 16. No 1;80-87

Freeman, D. L, Long, M. 2007. An introduction to second language Acquisition Research. New York : Longman

Gass.S & Selinker, L. M. 2008. Second language Acquisition. London; Routledge

Ghorbani, M. R & Nezamoshari’e, M. 2012. Cooperative Learning Boots EFL Students’ Grammar Achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 2 No. 7, pp. 1465-1471

Han, Z. Park, E. S, & Combs,C. 2008. Textual Enhancement of Input: Issues and Possibilities. Oxford University Press. Applied Linguistics 29/4: 597–618

Harmer, J. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching (Fourth Ed.) Harlow: Longman

Jabbarpoor, S & Abdollahzadeh, E. 2013. Textual Enhancement across Linguistic Structures: EFL Learners' Acquisition of English Forms. Journal of Language and Translation Vol.3, No. 2(5), (pp.69-78), Spring 2013

Jahan. A. & Kormos,J. 2015. The Impact of Textual Enhancement on EFL Learners’ Grammatical Awareness of Future Plans and Intentions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 25 No. 1 2015.

Khomeijani, A. A & Sarkhosh, F.M .(2012). Do Different Textual Enhancement Formats Have Differential Effects on the Intake of English Subjunctive Mood. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 688-698, April 2012

Krashen, S. 1982. Priciples and Practices in Second language Acquisition. Oxford: Permagon

Larsen-F, D. 2007. Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lee, S.K. 2007. Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiaritty on korean efl students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language learning 57;1, March 2007, pp. 87- 118. Language research club, university of Michigan

Loewon, S & Inceoglu, S. 2016. The Effect of Visual Input Enhancement on Noticing and L2 development of the Spanish Past Tense. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. Departement English Studies, faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts, Adam Mickiewicz University.

Long, M. & Robinson, P. 1998. Focus on Form: Theory, Research and Practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 13-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mehrdad, G. 2015. The Effect of Textual Input Enhancement on Learning Verbals in Hugh-School EFL Male Students Nika Tahmouresi. International Journal of Education Investigations Vol.2 No. 8. Retrived at www.ijeionline.com

Nahavandi, N & Mukundan, J . 2013. The Impact of Textual Input Enhancement and Explicit Rule Presentation on Iranian Elementary EFL Learners’ Intake of Simple Past Tense. English Language Teaching, Vol. 6, No. 1; 2013 ISSN 1916-4742 E-ISSN 1916-4750 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education

Nassaji & Fotos. 2011. Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms. New York. Routledge.

Park, H, Choi, S& Lee, M. (2012). Visual input enhancement, attention, grammar learning, and reading comprehension: An eye movement study. English Teaching, Vol. 67, No. 4, Winter 2012

Sadeghi, F. 2012. The Effect of Grammar Consciuosness Raising Task on EFL Learners Performance. International Journal of Linguistic.Vol. 4 No.3 Macrolink Institute.

Sarkhosha, M & Taghipourb, B & Sarkhoshc, H .(2012). Differential effect of different textual enhancement formats on intake. International Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 4, No. 2. ISSN 1948-5425 2012.

Sheen,R. 2002. ‘Focus on Form’ and ‘focus on forms ‘. ELT Journal Vol. 56/3 July. Oxford University Press . Retrived at http://www.eltj.org/ELTJ%20debate%202003/sheen.pdf

Smith, S. 1993. Input Enhancement in Instructed SLA: Theoretical Bases. Article on Studies in Second Language Acquisition. ReseachGate. Retrieved at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231897266

Thornburry,S. 2001. How to Teach Grammar. London: Pearson Education Limited

Torkabada, M. G & Fazilatfar, A. M. 2014. Textual Enhancement and Input Processing Effects on the Intake of Present and Past Simple Tenses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 ( 2014 ) 562 – 571

Wicaksono, J. A. 2015. The Effect of Textual Enhancement as Implicit Instruction in Teaching Passive Voice Achievement. Malang; Universitas Negeri Malang


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Noor Fitriah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

SKETCH JOURNAL: Journal of English Teaching, Literature and Linguistics
index by:

        

Published by:


STAI RAKHA Amuntai
Jl. Rakha, Pakapuran, Amuntai Utara, Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara, Kalimantan Selatan 71471
Phone: (0527) 61695
WhatsApp: 085251613000
Email: brightjournalrakha@gmail.com

 

Creative Commons License
SKETCH JOURNAL: Journal of English Teaching, Literature and Linguistics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.