Teori Disabilitas: Sebuah Review Literatur

M Anshari

Abstract


The way of how people see disability through human historical has born various number of disability theory. This situation happened because of the empty space formed by many factors in the context where the perspective was born. This article aims to describe a number of disability theory from classic era to postmodern era shortly. A new “perspective” will not replace the existing one which is still survive in certain society. A number of perspectives develops based on the human mindset development. Some of the disability theory are Moral Theory of Disability, Individual/Medical Theory of disability, Social Theory of Disability “Impairment Theory Of Disability”, and Religion Theory Of Disability.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Suka Yogyakarta.

Barnes, C. (1991). Disabled people in Britain and discrimination: a case for anti-discrimination legislation. London:___________.

Barnes, C. (1997a). A legacy of oppression: a history of disability in Western culture. In Barton, L. & Oliver, M (Eds.), Disability studies: Past, Present and Future Leeds. The Disability Press.

Barnes, C. (1997b). Theories of disability and the origins of the social oppression of disabled people in Western society. London: Longman.

Crow, L. (1996). Including all of our lives: renewing the social model of disability. Leeds: The Disability Press.

Etieyibo, E. & Omiegbe, O. (2016). Religion, culture, and discrimination against persons with disabilities in Nigeria. African Journal of Disability, 5(1). Retrieved from http://ajod.org.

Garland, R. (1995). Eye of beholder eformity and disability in Graeco Roman World. Itacha: Cornel University Press.

Haffer, C. (1968). The changeling: history and psychodynamiics of attitudes to handicapped children.European Folklore’ Journal of the History of Behavioural Sciences (4). Retrieved from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.

Ingstad, B. & Whyte, S.R. (1995). Disability and culture. In Ingstad, B. & Whyte, S.R. (Eds.), Disability and culture: an overview (pp. 3-31). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Kramer, H-J.S (2016). The Malleus Maleficarum : el Martilo de los borjus. Bercelona : Reditar Libros.

Lang, R. (2007). The development and critique of the social model of disability. London: Leonard Cheshire Disability and Inclusive Development Centre, UCL. Retrieved from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/lc-ccr/centrepublications/workingpapers.

Miles, M. (1995). Disability in an Eastern religious context: historical perspectives. Disability & Society, 10(1).

Miles, M. (2002). Some historical texts on disability in the classical Muslim world. Journal of Religion, Disability, and Health, 6(2).

Oliver, M. (1983).Social work with disabled people. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement: A sociological approach. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: from theory to practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Pals, D.L. (2006). Eight theories of religion. New York: Oxford.

Richardson, K.L. (2012). Difference and disability in the medieval Islamic world. ________: Edinburgh University Press.

Rooshey, H. et al. (2008). Disability and the Muslim perspective: an introduction for rehabilitation and health care providers. New York: The University of Buffalo.

Pinder, R. (1996). Sick but fit or fit but sick? Ambiguity and identity in the workplace. Leeds: Disability Press.

Schumm, D. & Stolzfus, M. (Eds.). (2011). Disability and religious diversity: cross-cultural and interreligious perspectives. US: Palgrave Macmillan.

Schumm, D. & Stolzfus, M. (Eds.). (2013). Chronic illness, spirituality, and healing: diverse disciplinary, religious, and cultural perspectives. US: Plgrave Macmillan.

Schumm, D. & Stolzfus, M. (Eds.). (2016). Disability and world religions: an introduction. _________: Baylor University Press.

Shakespeare, T. (2002). The social model of disability: an outmoded ideology. Research in social science and disability. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Solihin, R. (2018). Tabu dalam masyarakat Banjar. Dissertation: UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Tylor, E.B. (1871). Primitive culture. London: John Murray.




______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ INDEXING SITE GOOGLE SCHOLAR ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Modernity by Modernity Jurnal Pendidikan dan Islam Kontemporer is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http:http://jurnal.stairakha-amuntai.ac.id/index.php/modernity/index Address: Jl. Rakha, Pakapuran, Amuntai Utara, Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara, Kalimantan Selatan 71471 Email: modernity@gmail.com